Lithuania vs Mauritius: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, both sexes
Lithuania
105.4%
in 2018
Mauritius
105.7%
in 2019
Lithuania rank
55th
Mauritius rank
53rd
Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, both sexes over time
- Lithuania
- Mauritius
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 105.7% against 105.4% in Lithuania, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 21 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Mauritius ahead.
Lithuania ranks 55th and Mauritius ranks 53rd of 188 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 1 and Mauritius in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 92.9% | 99.9% | 7.1% | Mauritius |
| 2000s | 103.4% | 101.1% | 2.3% | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 103.7% | 104.4% | 0.7% | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, both sexes, Lithuania or Mauritius?
- Mauritius, at 105.7% against 105.4% in Lithuania as of 2019.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, both sexes between Lithuania and Mauritius?
- 0.3%, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Mauritius?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2018.
- How do Lithuania and Mauritius rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, both sexes?
- Lithuania ranks 55th and Mauritius ranks 53rd of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total enrollment in primary and lower secondary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the population of official primary and lower secondary education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.