East Asia & Pacific vs Mexico: Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, both sexes
East Asia & Pacific
100.5%
in 2019
Mexico
112.1%
in 2018
East Asia & Pacific rank
18th
Mexico rank
18th
Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, both sexes over time
- East Asia & Pacific
- Mexico
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 112.1% against 100.5% in East Asia & Pacific, a difference of 11.6%.
That makes Mexico's figure about 1.1 times East Asia & Pacific's.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Mexico has been ahead every year.
East Asia & Pacific ranks 18th and Mexico ranks 18th of 45 groups.
Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | East Asia & Pacific | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 96.4% | 100.6% | 4.2% | Mexico |
| 2000s | 98.1% | 108.1% | 10.0% | Mexico |
| 2010s | 98.3% | 112.8% | 14.4% | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, both sexes, East Asia & Pacific or Mexico?
- Mexico, at 112.1% against 100.5% in East Asia & Pacific as of 2018.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, both sexes between East Asia & Pacific and Mexico?
- 11.6%, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific and Mexico?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2018.
- How do East Asia & Pacific and Mexico rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, both sexes?
- East Asia & Pacific ranks 18th and Mexico ranks 18th of 45 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, primary and lower secondary, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total enrollment in primary and lower secondary education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the population of official primary and lower secondary education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.