Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) vs Poland: Gross enrolment ratio for tertiary education, adjusted gender parity

Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD)
1.03 GPIA
in 2019
Poland
1.34 GPIA
in 2018
Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) rank
34th
Poland rank
37th

Gross enrolment ratio for tertiary education, adjusted gender parity over time

  • Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD)
  • Poland
0.40.60.811.21.4197019942019

How they compare

Poland currently reports 1.34 GPIA against 1.03 GPIA in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD), a difference of 0.31 GPIA.

That makes Poland's figure about 1.3 times Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD)'s.

Across all 48 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.

Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) ranks 34th and Poland ranks 37th of 43 groups.

Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) Poland Difference Ahead
1970s 0.4666 GPIA 1.11 GPIA 0.6398 GPIA Poland
1980s 0.5438 GPIA 1.24 GPIA 0.6926 GPIA Poland
1990s 0.6939 GPIA 1.28 GPIA 0.586 GPIA Poland
2000s 0.9297 GPIA 1.3 GPIA 0.3665 GPIA Poland
2010s 0.9925 GPIA 1.35 GPIA 0.3561 GPIA Poland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross enrolment ratio for tertiary education, adjusted gender parity, Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) or Poland?
Poland, at 1.34 GPIA against 1.03 GPIA in Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) as of 2018.
What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio for tertiary education, adjusted gender parity between Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) and Poland?
0.31 GPIA, with Poland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) and Poland?
48 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2018.
How do Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) and Poland rank globally for gross enrolment ratio for tertiary education, adjusted gender parity?
Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) ranks 34th and Poland ranks 37th of 43 groups.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio for tertiary education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) vs Poland: Gross enrolment ratio for tertiary education, adjusted gender parity. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/gross-enrolment-ratio-for-tertiary-education-adjusted-gender-parity-index-gpia/middle-east-north-africa-afghanistan-and-pakistan-ida-and-ibrd/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/gross-enrolment-ratio-for-tertiary-education-adjusted-gender-parity-index-gpia/middle-east-north-africa-afghanistan-and-pakistan-ida-and-ibrd/poland/">Middle East, North Africa, Afghanistan & Pakistan (IDA & IBRD) vs Poland: Gross enrolment ratio for tertiary education, adjusted gender parity</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross enrolment ratio for tertiary education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)
Unit
GPIA
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
224 places, 7,092 data points, 1970–2020
Last refreshed

The Adjusted Gender Parity Index (GPIA) is calculated by dividing the female value for the indicator by the male value for the indicator. If the resulting value exceeds 1, the ratio is inverted and subtracted from 2. The adjusted gender parity index is symmetrical around 1 and lies in the range 0-2. An adjusted GPI equal to 1 indicates parity between females and males. In general, a value less than 1 indicates disparity in favor of males and a value greater than 1 indicates disparity in favor of females. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute for Statistics: http://uis.unesco.org/