Middle income vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development over time
- Middle income
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
How they compare
Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 68.5% against 22.8% in Middle income, a difference of 45.7%.
That makes Saint Kitts and Nevis's figure about 3.0 times Middle income's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Saint Kitts and Nevis has been ahead every year.
Middle income ranks 8th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 5th of 33 groups.
Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Middle income | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 11.6% | 59.9% | 48.2% | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2010s | 16.9% | 77.5% | 60.6% | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development, Middle income or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 68.5% against 22.8% in Middle income as of 2016.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development between Middle income and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 45.7%, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Middle income and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2016.
- How do Middle income and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development?
- Middle income ranks 8th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 5th of 33 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total male enrollment in early childhood educational development programmes, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total male population of the official age for early childhood educational development programmes. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.