Low & middle income vs Russian Federation: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development over time
- Low & middle income
- Russian Federation
How they compare
Russian Federation currently reports 57.0% against 21.8% in Low & middle income, a difference of 35.2%.
That makes Russian Federation's figure about 2.6 times Low & middle income's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Russian Federation has been ahead every year.
Low & middle income ranks 13th and Russian Federation ranks 11th of 34 groups.
Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Low & middle income | Russian Federation | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 11.9% | 55.7% | 43.8% | Russian Federation |
| 2010s | 17.3% | 57.1% | 39.8% | Russian Federation |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development, Low & middle income or Russian Federation?
- Russian Federation, at 57.0% against 21.8% in Low & middle income as of 2018.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development between Low & middle income and Russian Federation?
- 35.2%, with Russian Federation ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Low & middle income and Russian Federation?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2018.
- How do Low & middle income and Russian Federation rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development?
- Low & middle income ranks 13th and Russian Federation ranks 11th of 34 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, male (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total male enrollment in early childhood educational development programmes, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total male population of the official age for early childhood educational development programmes. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.