Mongolia vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program over time
- Mongolia
- Tanzania, United Republic of
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Mongolia ahead.
Mongolia ranks 68th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 68th of 174 countries.
Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Tanzania, United Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 15.2% | 0.0% | 15.2% | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program, Mongolia or Tanzania, United Republic of?
- Mongolia, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2018.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program between Mongolia and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 0.0%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Tanzania, United Republic of?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2018.
- How do Mongolia and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program?
- Mongolia ranks 68th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 68th of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total female enrollment in early childhood educational development programmes, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total female population of the official age for early childhood educational development programmes. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.