Lithuania vs Montenegro: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program over time
- Lithuania
- Montenegro
How they compare
Montenegro currently reports 36.7% against 28.2% in Lithuania, a difference of 8.5%.
That makes Montenegro's figure about 1.3 times Lithuania's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Lithuania ahead.
Lithuania ranks 29th and Montenegro ranks 26th of 174 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 1 and Montenegro in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 14.3% | 5.7% | 8.6% | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 24.5% | 30.0% | 5.5% | Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program, Lithuania or Montenegro?
- Montenegro, at 36.7% against 28.2% in Lithuania as of 2019.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program between Lithuania and Montenegro?
- 8.5%, with Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Montenegro?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2018.
- How do Lithuania and Montenegro rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program?
- Lithuania ranks 29th and Montenegro ranks 26th of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total female enrollment in early childhood educational development programmes, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total female population of the official age for early childhood educational development programmes. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.