IDA only vs Saint Lucia: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development over time
- IDA only
- Saint Lucia
How they compare
Saint Lucia currently reports 37.8% against 8.9% in IDA only, a difference of 28.9%.
That makes Saint Lucia's figure about 4.2 times IDA only's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2003 it was IDA only ahead.
IDA only ranks 25th and Saint Lucia ranks 24th of 33 groups.
Across the 2 decades both report, IDA only averaged higher in 1 and Saint Lucia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | IDA only | Saint Lucia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6.9% | 0.0% | 6.9% | IDA only |
| 2010s | 9.8% | 25.1% | 15.3% | Saint Lucia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development, IDA only or Saint Lucia?
- Saint Lucia, at 37.8% against 8.9% in IDA only as of 2019.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development between IDA only and Saint Lucia?
- 28.9%, with Saint Lucia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for IDA only and Saint Lucia?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2019.
- How do IDA only and Saint Lucia rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development?
- IDA only ranks 25th and Saint Lucia ranks 24th of 33 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total female enrollment in early childhood educational development programmes, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total female population of the official age for early childhood educational development programmes. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.