Iceland vs Small states: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program over time
- Iceland
- Small states
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 46.9% against 20.2% in Small states, a difference of 26.7%.
That makes Iceland's figure about 2.3 times Small states's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Small states ahead.
Iceland ranks 15th and Small states ranks 15th of 174 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 1 and Small states in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Small states | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0% | 2.2% | 2.2% | Small states |
| 2010s | 33.3% | 13.7% | 19.6% | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program, Iceland or Small states?
- Iceland, at 46.9% against 20.2% in Small states as of 2018.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program between Iceland and Small states?
- 26.7%, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Small states?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
- How do Iceland and Small states rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program?
- Iceland ranks 15th and Small states ranks 15th of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total female enrollment in early childhood educational development programmes, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total female population of the official age for early childhood educational development programmes. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.