Guatemala vs Tonga: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program
Guatemala
1.4%
in 2019
Tonga
0.0%
in 2015
Guatemala rank
65th
Tonga rank
68th
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program over time
- Guatemala
- Tonga
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 1.4% against 0.0% in Tonga, a difference of 1.4%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Tonga ahead.
Guatemala ranks 65th and Tonga ranks 68th of 174 countries.
Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2000s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2010s | 1.8% | 0.0% | 1.8% | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program, Guatemala or Tonga?
- Guatemala, at 1.4% against 0.0% in Tonga as of 2019.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program between Guatemala and Tonga?
- 1.4%, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Tonga?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2015.
- How do Guatemala and Tonga rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program?
- Guatemala ranks 65th and Tonga ranks 68th of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total female enrollment in early childhood educational development programmes, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total female population of the official age for early childhood educational development programmes. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.