Guatemala vs Samoa: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program
Guatemala
1.4%
in 2019
Samoa
0.0%
in 2019
Guatemala rank
65th
Samoa rank
68th
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program over time
- Guatemala
- Samoa
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 1.4% against 0.0% in Samoa, a difference of 1.4%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Samoa ahead.
Guatemala ranks 65th and Samoa ranks 68th of 174 countries.
Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2000s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2010s | 1.5% | 0.0% | 1.5% | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program, Guatemala or Samoa?
- Guatemala, at 1.4% against 0.0% in Samoa as of 2019.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program between Guatemala and Samoa?
- 1.4%, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Samoa?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2019.
- How do Guatemala and Samoa rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program?
- Guatemala ranks 65th and Samoa ranks 68th of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total female enrollment in early childhood educational development programmes, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total female population of the official age for early childhood educational development programmes. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.