Equatorial Guinea vs Panama: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Panama
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 2.5% against 1.5% in Panama, a difference of 1.0%.
That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.8 times Panama's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Panama ahead.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 62nd and Panama ranks 64th of 174 countries.
Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2000s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2010s | 1.3% | 0.8% | 0.5% | Equatorial Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program, Equatorial Guinea or Panama?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 2.5% against 1.5% in Panama as of 2015.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program between Equatorial Guinea and Panama?
- 1.0%, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Panama?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2015.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Panama rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 62nd and Panama ranks 64th of 174 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total female enrollment in early childhood educational development programmes, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total female population of the official age for early childhood educational development programmes. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.