Belize vs Samoa: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program

Belize
0.0%
in 2019
Samoa
0.0%
in 2019
Belize rank
68th
Samoa rank
68th

Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program over time

  • Belize
  • Samoa
00.20.40.60.81199820082019

How they compare

Belize currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Samoa, a difference of 0.0%.

Across all 13 years both countries report, Samoa has been ahead every year.

Belize ranks 68th and Samoa ranks 68th of 174 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belize Samoa Difference Ahead
2000s 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
2010s 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program, Belize or Samoa?
Belize, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Samoa as of 2019.
What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program between Belize and Samoa?
0.0%, with Belize ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Samoa?
13 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2019.
How do Belize and Samoa rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program?
Belize ranks 68th and Samoa ranks 68th of 174 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, female (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
208 places, 2,961 data points, 1997–2020
Last refreshed

Total female enrollment in early childhood educational development programmes, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total female population of the official age for early childhood educational development programmes. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.