Norway vs Slovenia: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program over time
- Norway
- Slovenia
How they compare
Norway currently reports 85.0% against 62.0% in Slovenia, a difference of 23.0%.
That makes Norway's figure about 1.4 times Slovenia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Slovenia ahead.
Norway ranks 3rd and Slovenia ranks 6th of 177 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Norway averaged higher in 1 and Slovenia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Norway | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0% | 25.1% | 25.1% | Slovenia |
| 2000s | 0.0% | 28.3% | 28.3% | Slovenia |
| 2010s | 82.1% | 57.2% | 25.0% | Norway |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program, Norway or Slovenia?
- Norway, at 85.0% against 62.0% in Slovenia as of 2018.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program between Norway and Slovenia?
- 23.0%, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Slovenia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2018.
- How do Norway and Slovenia rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program?
- Norway ranks 3rd and Slovenia ranks 6th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total enrollment in early childhood educational development programmes, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total population of the official age for early childhood educational development programmes. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.