Mongolia vs Samoa: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program

Mongolia
0.0%
in 2018
Samoa
0.0%
in 2019
Mongolia rank
69th
Samoa rank
69th

Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program over time

  • Mongolia
  • Samoa
051015199820082019

How they compare

Mongolia currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Samoa, a difference of 0.0%.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Mongolia ahead.

Mongolia ranks 69th and Samoa ranks 69th of 177 countries.

Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mongolia Samoa Difference Ahead
2000s 16.4% 0.0% 16.4% Mongolia
2010s 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program, Mongolia or Samoa?
Mongolia, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Samoa as of 2018.
What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program between Mongolia and Samoa?
0.0%, with Mongolia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Samoa?
8 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
How do Mongolia and Samoa rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program?
Mongolia ranks 69th and Samoa ranks 69th of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, both sexes (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
211 places, 3,062 data points, 1997–2020
Last refreshed

Total enrollment in early childhood educational development programmes, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total population of the official age for early childhood educational development programmes. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.