Mauritius vs Viet Nam: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program over time
- Mauritius
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Viet Nam currently reports 15.9% against 13.6% in Mauritius, a difference of 2.3%.
That makes Viet Nam's figure about 1.2 times Mauritius's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 22 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Viet Nam ahead.
Mauritius ranks 46th and Viet Nam ranks 44th of 177 countries.
Viet Nam has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2000s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2010s | 9.7% | 10.1% | 0.4% | Viet Nam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program, Mauritius or Viet Nam?
- Viet Nam, at 15.9% against 13.6% in Mauritius as of 2019.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program between Mauritius and Viet Nam?
- 2.3%, with Viet Nam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Viet Nam?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2019.
- How do Mauritius and Viet Nam rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program?
- Mauritius ranks 46th and Viet Nam ranks 44th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total enrollment in early childhood educational development programmes, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total population of the official age for early childhood educational development programmes. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.