Hong Kong, China vs Mauritania: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development over time
- Hong Kong, China
- Mauritania
How they compare
Hong Kong, China currently reports 0.0% against 0.0% in Mauritania, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.
Hong Kong, China ranks 69th and Mauritania ranks 69th of 177 countries.
Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong, China | Mauritania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 43.8% | 1.0% | 42.7% | Hong Kong, China |
| 2010s | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development, Hong Kong, China or Mauritania?
- Hong Kong, China, at 0.0% against 0.0% in Mauritania as of 2019.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development between Hong Kong, China and Mauritania?
- 0.0%, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Mauritania?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2015.
- How do Hong Kong, China and Mauritania rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 69th and Mauritania ranks 69th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total enrollment in early childhood educational development programmes, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total population of the official age for early childhood educational development programmes. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.