Estonia vs Lithuania: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program over time
- Estonia
- Lithuania
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 30.4% against 28.3% in Lithuania, a difference of 2.1%.
That makes Estonia's figure about 1.1 times Lithuania's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Lithuania ahead.
Estonia ranks 28th and Lithuania ranks 30th of 177 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Estonia averaged higher in 1 and Lithuania in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0% | 13.0% | 13.0% | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 0.0% | 14.1% | 14.1% | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 26.9% | 23.4% | 3.5% | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program, Estonia or Lithuania?
- Estonia, at 30.4% against 28.3% in Lithuania as of 2018.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program between Estonia and Lithuania?
- 2.1%, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Lithuania?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2018.
- How do Estonia and Lithuania rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program?
- Estonia ranks 28th and Lithuania ranks 30th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total enrollment in early childhood educational development programmes, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total population of the official age for early childhood educational development programmes. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.