East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) vs Slovenia: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development over time
- East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)
- Slovenia
How they compare
Slovenia currently reports 62.0% against 34.3% in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries), a difference of 27.7%.
That makes Slovenia's figure about 1.8 times East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries)'s.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Slovenia has been ahead every year.
East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 3rd and Slovenia ranks 6th of 34 groups.
Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development, East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) or Slovenia?
- Slovenia, at 62.0% against 34.3% in East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) as of 2018.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development between East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and Slovenia?
- 27.7%, with Slovenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and Slovenia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2018.
- How do East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) and Slovenia rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development?
- East Asia & Pacific (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 3rd and Slovenia ranks 6th of 34 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total enrollment in early childhood educational development programmes, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total population of the official age for early childhood educational development programmes. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.