Denmark vs IBRD only: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program over time
- Denmark
- IBRD only
How they compare
Denmark currently reports 61.9% against 23.8% in IBRD only, a difference of 38.1%.
That makes Denmark's figure about 2.6 times IBRD only's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2007 it was IBRD only ahead.
Denmark ranks 7th and IBRD only ranks 9th of 177 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Denmark averaged higher in 1 and IBRD only in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Denmark | IBRD only | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0% | 19.4% | 19.4% | IBRD only |
| 2010s | 40.7% | 20.5% | 20.2% | Denmark |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program, Denmark or IBRD only?
- Denmark, at 61.9% against 23.8% in IBRD only as of 2018.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program between Denmark and IBRD only?
- 38.1%, with Denmark ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and IBRD only?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
- How do Denmark and IBRD only rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program?
- Denmark ranks 7th and IBRD only ranks 9th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total enrollment in early childhood educational development programmes, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total population of the official age for early childhood educational development programmes. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.