Cuba vs Norway: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program

Cuba
90.5%
in 2019
Norway
85.0%
in 2018
Cuba rank
1st
Norway rank
3rd

Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program over time

  • Cuba
  • Norway
020406080100199820082019

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 90.5% against 85.0% in Norway, a difference of 5.5%.

That makes Cuba's figure about 1.1 times Norway's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 19 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Cuba ahead.

Cuba ranks 1st and Norway ranks 3rd of 177 countries.

Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Norway Difference Ahead
1990s 85.3% 0.0% 85.3% Cuba
2000s 82.2% 0.0% 82.2% Cuba
2010s 85.1% 61.6% 23.5% Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program, Cuba or Norway?
Cuba, at 90.5% against 85.0% in Norway as of 2019.
What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program between Cuba and Norway?
5.5%, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Norway?
19 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2018.
How do Cuba and Norway rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program?
Cuba ranks 1st and Norway ranks 3rd of 177 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, both sexes (%)
Unit
%
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
211 places, 3,062 data points, 1997–2020
Last refreshed

Total enrollment in early childhood educational development programmes, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total population of the official age for early childhood educational development programmes. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.