Cuba vs East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income): Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development over time
- Cuba
- East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 90.5% against 34.1% in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), a difference of 56.4%.
That makes Cuba's figure about 2.7 times East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)'s.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Cuba has been ahead every year.
Cuba ranks 1st and East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 4th of 177 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development, Cuba or East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)?
- Cuba, at 90.5% against 34.1% in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) as of 2019.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development between Cuba and East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)?
- 56.4%, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2019.
- How do Cuba and East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development?
- Cuba ranks 1st and East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 4th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total enrollment in early childhood educational development programmes, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total population of the official age for early childhood educational development programmes. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.