Argentina vs Qatar: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program over time
- Argentina
- Qatar
How they compare
Qatar currently reports 6.7% against 5.5% in Argentina, a difference of 1.2%.
That makes Qatar's figure about 1.2 times Argentina's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Argentina ahead.
Argentina ranks 55th and Qatar ranks 52nd of 177 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 2 and Qatar in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Qatar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.2% | 0.0% | 1.2% | Argentina |
| 2000s | 2.5% | 0.0% | 2.5% | Argentina |
| 2010s | 5.1% | 6.4% | 1.3% | Qatar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program, Argentina or Qatar?
- Qatar, at 6.7% against 5.5% in Argentina as of 2019.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program between Argentina and Qatar?
- 1.2%, with Qatar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Qatar?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2017.
- How do Argentina and Qatar rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program?
- Argentina ranks 55th and Qatar ranks 52nd of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total enrollment in early childhood educational development programmes, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total population of the official age for early childhood educational development programmes. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.