Argentina vs Cambodia: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program over time
- Argentina
- Cambodia
How they compare
Argentina currently reports 5.5% against 5.2% in Cambodia, a difference of 0.3%.
That makes Argentina's figure about 1.1 times Cambodia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Argentina ahead.
Argentina ranks 55th and Cambodia ranks 57th of 177 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 2 and Cambodia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Cambodia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.2% | 0.0% | 1.2% | Argentina |
| 2000s | 1.9% | 0.4% | 1.6% | Argentina |
| 2010s | 4.7% | 6.0% | 1.3% | Cambodia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program, Argentina or Cambodia?
- Argentina, at 5.5% against 5.2% in Cambodia as of 2017.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program between Argentina and Cambodia?
- 0.3%, with Argentina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Cambodia?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2012.
- How do Argentina and Cambodia rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program?
- Argentina ranks 55th and Cambodia ranks 57th of 177 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, both sexes (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total enrollment in early childhood educational development programmes, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total population of the official age for early childhood educational development programmes. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.