Liberia vs Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program

Liberia
0 GPIA
in 2017
Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China
0 GPIA
in 2019
Liberia rank
67th
Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China rank
67th

Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program over time

  • Liberia
  • Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China
00.20.40.60.81199920092019

How they compare

Liberia currently reports 0 GPIA against 0 GPIA in Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China, a difference of 0 GPIA.

Across all 8 years both countries report, Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China has been ahead every year.

Liberia ranks 67th and Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China ranks 67th of 173 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Liberia Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China Difference Ahead
2000s 0 GPIA 0 GPIA 0 GPIA
2010s 0 GPIA 0 GPIA 0 GPIA

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program, Liberia or Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China?
Liberia, at 0 GPIA against 0 GPIA in Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China as of 2017.
What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program between Liberia and Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China?
0 GPIA, with Liberia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Liberia and Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China?
8 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2017.
How do Liberia and Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program?
Liberia ranks 67th and Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China ranks 67th of 173 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Liberia vs Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/gross-enrolment-ratio-early-childhood-educational-development-programmes-adjusted-gender/liberia/macao-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/gross-enrolment-ratio-early-childhood-educational-development-programmes-adjusted-gender/liberia/macao-sar-china/">Liberia vs Macao Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)
Unit
GPIA
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
207 places, 2,956 data points, 1997–2020
Last refreshed

The Adjusted Gender Parity Index (GPIA) is calculated by dividing the female value for the indicator by the male value for the indicator. If the resulting value exceeds 1, the ratio is inverted and subtracted from 2. The adjusted gender parity index is symmetrical around 1 and lies in the range 0-2. An adjusted GPI equal to 1 indicates parity between females and males. In general, a value less than 1 indicates disparity in favor of males and a value greater than 1 indicates disparity in favor of females. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute for Statistics: http://uis.unesco.org/