Hong Kong (China) vs Samoa: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program

Hong Kong (China)
0 GPIA
in 2019
Samoa
0 GPIA
in 2019
Hong Kong (China) rank
67th
Samoa rank
67th

Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program over time

  • Hong Kong (China)
  • Samoa
00.20.40.60.81199820082019

How they compare

Hong Kong (China) currently reports 0 GPIA against 0 GPIA in Samoa, a difference of 0 GPIA.

Across all 12 years both countries report, Samoa has been ahead every year.

Hong Kong (China) ranks 67th and Samoa ranks 67th of 173 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong (China) Samoa Difference Ahead
2000s 0 GPIA 0 GPIA 0 GPIA
2010s 0 GPIA 0 GPIA 0 GPIA

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program, Hong Kong (China) or Samoa?
Hong Kong (China), at 0 GPIA against 0 GPIA in Samoa as of 2019.
What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program between Hong Kong (China) and Samoa?
0 GPIA, with Hong Kong (China) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong (China) and Samoa?
12 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2019.
How do Hong Kong (China) and Samoa rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program?
Hong Kong (China) ranks 67th and Samoa ranks 67th of 173 countries.
Where does this data come from?
UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong (China) vs Samoa: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program. Statizoid, drawing on UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/gross-enrolment-ratio-early-childhood-educational-development-programmes-adjusted-gender/hong-kong-sar-china/samoa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/gross-enrolment-ratio-early-childhood-educational-development-programmes-adjusted-gender/hong-kong-sar-china/samoa/">Hong Kong (China) vs Samoa: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA)
Unit
GPIA
Source
UNESCO Institute for Statistics
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
207 places, 2,956 data points, 1997–2020
Last refreshed

The Adjusted Gender Parity Index (GPIA) is calculated by dividing the female value for the indicator by the male value for the indicator. If the resulting value exceeds 1, the ratio is inverted and subtracted from 2. The adjusted gender parity index is symmetrical around 1 and lies in the range 0-2. An adjusted GPI equal to 1 indicates parity between females and males. In general, a value less than 1 indicates disparity in favor of males and a value greater than 1 indicates disparity in favor of females. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute for Statistics: http://uis.unesco.org/