Finland vs Low income: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program over time
- Finland
- Low income
How they compare
Finland currently reports 1 GPIA against 0.9846 GPIA in Low income, a difference of 0.0154 GPIA.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Low income ahead.
Finland ranks 22nd and Low income ranks 18th of 173 countries.
Low income has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program, Finland or Low income?
- Finland, at 1 GPIA against 0.9846 GPIA in Low income as of 2018.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program between Finland and Low income?
- 0.0154 GPIA, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Low income?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2014.
- How do Finland and Low income rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development program?
- Finland ranks 22nd and Low income ranks 18th of 173 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood educational development programmes, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Adjusted Gender Parity Index (GPIA) is calculated by dividing the female value for the indicator by the male value for the indicator. If the resulting value exceeds 1, the ratio is inverted and subtracted from 2. The adjusted gender parity index is symmetrical around 1 and lies in the range 0-2. An adjusted GPI equal to 1 indicates parity between females and males. In general, a value less than 1 indicates disparity in favor of males and a value greater than 1 indicates disparity in favor of females. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute for Statistics: http://uis.unesco.org/