Luxembourg vs Small states: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood education, female
Luxembourg
90.8%
in 2018
Small states
39.5%
in 2019
Luxembourg rank
23rd
Small states rank
21st
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood education, female over time
- Luxembourg
- Small states
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 90.8% against 39.5% in Small states, a difference of 51.3%.
That makes Luxembourg's figure about 2.3 times Small states's.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Luxembourg has been ahead every year.
Luxembourg ranks 23rd and Small states ranks 21st of 164 countries.
Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Small states | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 86.4% | 36.6% | 49.8% | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 91.6% | 38.1% | 53.5% | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, early childhood education, female, Luxembourg or Small states?
- Luxembourg, at 90.8% against 39.5% in Small states as of 2018.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, early childhood education, female between Luxembourg and Small states?
- 51.3%, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Small states?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
- How do Luxembourg and Small states rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood education, female?
- Luxembourg ranks 23rd and Small states ranks 21st of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood education, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total female enrollment in early childhood education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total female population of official early childhood education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.