Low & middle income vs Philippines: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood education, female
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood education, female over time
- Low & middle income
- Philippines
How they compare
Philippines currently reports 98.1% against 49.3% in Low & middle income, a difference of 48.8%.
That makes Philippines's figure about 2.0 times Low & middle income's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Philippines has been ahead every year.
Low & middle income ranks 14th and Philippines ranks 14th of 34 groups.
Philippines has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Low & middle income | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 31.3% | 45.1% | 13.8% | Philippines |
| 2010s | 47.0% | 97.5% | 50.5% | Philippines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, early childhood education, female, Low & middle income or Philippines?
- Philippines, at 98.1% against 49.3% in Low & middle income as of 2018.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, early childhood education, female between Low & middle income and Philippines?
- 48.8%, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Low & middle income and Philippines?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2018.
- How do Low & middle income and Philippines rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood education, female?
- Low & middle income ranks 14th and Philippines ranks 14th of 34 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood education, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total female enrollment in early childhood education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total female population of official early childhood education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.