Dominica vs Marshall Islands: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood education, female
Dominica
38.0%
in 2019
Marshall Islands
36.5%
in 2016
Dominica rank
116th
Marshall Islands rank
117th
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood education, female over time
- Dominica
- Marshall Islands
How they compare
Dominica currently reports 38.0% against 36.5% in Marshall Islands, a difference of 1.5%.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Dominica has been ahead every year.
Dominica ranks 116th and Marshall Islands ranks 117th of 164 countries.
Dominica has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominica | Marshall Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 78.6% | 64.7% | 13.9% | Dominica |
| 2000s | 92.8% | 49.9% | 43.0% | Dominica |
| 2010s | 64.7% | 40.4% | 24.3% | Dominica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, early childhood education, female, Dominica or Marshall Islands?
- Dominica, at 38.0% against 36.5% in Marshall Islands as of 2019.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, early childhood education, female between Dominica and Marshall Islands?
- 1.5%, with Dominica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominica and Marshall Islands?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2016.
- How do Dominica and Marshall Islands rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood education, female?
- Dominica ranks 116th and Marshall Islands ranks 117th of 164 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood education, female (%). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total female enrollment in early childhood education, regardless of age, expressed as a percentage of the total female population of official early childhood education age. GER can exceed 100% due to the inclusion of over-aged and under-aged students because of early or late school entrance and grade repetition.