China vs Latvia: Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood education, adjusted gender
Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood education, adjusted gender over time
- China
- Latvia
How they compare
China currently reports 1 GPIA against 1 GPIA in Latvia, a difference of 0 GPIA.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2013 it was China ahead.
China ranks 82nd and Latvia ranks 84th of 161 countries.
China has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross enrolment ratio, early childhood education, adjusted gender, China or Latvia?
- China, at 1 GPIA against 1 GPIA in Latvia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in gross enrolment ratio, early childhood education, adjusted gender between China and Latvia?
- 0 GPIA, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Latvia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2018.
- How do China and Latvia rank globally for gross enrolment ratio, early childhood education, adjusted gender?
- China ranks 82nd and Latvia ranks 84th of 161 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- UNESCO Institute for Statistics, published as Gross enrolment ratio, early childhood education, adjusted gender parity index (GPIA). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Adjusted Gender Parity Index (GPIA) is calculated by dividing the female value for the indicator by the male value for the indicator. If the resulting value exceeds 1, the ratio is inverted and subtracted from 2. The adjusted gender parity index is symmetrical around 1 and lies in the range 0-2. An adjusted GPI equal to 1 indicates parity between females and males. In general, a value less than 1 indicates disparity in favor of males and a value greater than 1 indicates disparity in favor of females. For more information, consult the UNESCO Institute for Statistics: http://uis.unesco.org/