Tonga vs Vietnam: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate over time
- Tonga
- Vietnam
How they compare
Tonga currently reports -0.0373 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.0923 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Vietnam, a difference of 0.055 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Vietnam ahead.
Tonga ranks 104th and Vietnam ranks 107th of 204 countries.
Vietnam has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Tonga | Vietnam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -0.5258 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4397 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0862 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Vietnam |
| 2010s | -0.1083 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0989 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0094 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Vietnam |
| 2020s | -0.0567 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0518 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0049 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Vietnam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher government effectiveness - governance estimate, Tonga or Vietnam?
- Tonga, at -0.0373 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.0923 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Vietnam as of 2024.
- What is the difference in government effectiveness - governance estimate between Tonga and Vietnam?
- 0.055 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Tonga ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Tonga and Vietnam?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
- How do Tonga and Vietnam rank globally for government effectiveness - governance estimate?
- Tonga ranks 104th and Vietnam ranks 107th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.