San Marino vs Uruguay: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time
- San Marino
- Uruguay
How they compare
San Marino currently reports 0.8671 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.8625 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Uruguay, a difference of 0.0046 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2015 it was San Marino ahead.
San Marino ranks 46th and Uruguay ranks 47th of 206 countries.
San Marino has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | San Marino | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.45 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.7652 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.6809 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | San Marino |
| 2020s | 1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.8847 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2126 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | San Marino |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher government effectiveness - governance estimate, San Marino or Uruguay?
- San Marino, at 0.8671 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.8625 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Uruguay as of 2025.
- What is the difference in government effectiveness - governance estimate between San Marino and Uruguay?
- 0.0046 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with San Marino ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for San Marino and Uruguay?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2025.
- How do San Marino and Uruguay rank globally for government effectiveness - governance estimate?
- San Marino ranks 46th and Uruguay ranks 47th of 206 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.