Qatar vs Slovenia: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate over time
- Qatar
- Slovenia
How they compare
Qatar currently reports 1.13 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.09 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Slovenia, a difference of 0.04 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Slovenia ahead.
Qatar ranks 34th and Slovenia ranks 37th of 204 countries.
Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Qatar | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.2328 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.6377 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.4049 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Slovenia |
| 2000s | 0.4454 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.7786 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3332 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Slovenia |
| 2010s | 0.9852 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.04 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0524 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Slovenia |
| 2020s | 1.11 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.24 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1325 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher government effectiveness - governance estimate, Qatar or Slovenia?
- Qatar, at 1.13 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.09 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Slovenia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in government effectiveness - governance estimate between Qatar and Slovenia?
- 0.04 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Qatar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Qatar and Slovenia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
- How do Qatar and Slovenia rank globally for government effectiveness - governance estimate?
- Qatar ranks 34th and Slovenia ranks 37th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.