Portugal vs San Marino: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate over time
- Portugal
- San Marino
How they compare
Portugal currently reports 0.9475 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.8976 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in San Marino, a difference of 0.0499 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
That makes Portugal's figure about 1.1 times San Marino's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2015 it was San Marino ahead.
Portugal ranks 39th and San Marino ranks 41st of 204 countries.
San Marino has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Portugal | San Marino | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.46 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3536 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | San Marino |
| 2020s | 1.04 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.17 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1327 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | San Marino |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher government effectiveness - governance estimate, Portugal or San Marino?
- Portugal, at 0.9475 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.8976 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in San Marino as of 2024.
- What is the difference in government effectiveness - governance estimate between Portugal and San Marino?
- 0.0499 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Portugal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Portugal and San Marino?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
- How do Portugal and San Marino rank globally for government effectiveness - governance estimate?
- Portugal ranks 39th and San Marino ranks 41st of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.