Philippines vs Samoa: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

Philippines
0.1947 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Samoa
0.2026 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Philippines rank
90th
Samoa rank
88th

Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • Philippines
  • Samoa
-0.5-0.2500.250.50.75199620102025

How they compare

Samoa currently reports 0.2026 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.1947 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Philippines, a difference of 0.0079 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Philippines ahead.

Philippines ranks 90th and Samoa ranks 88th of 206 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Philippines averaged higher in 1 and Samoa in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Philippines Samoa Difference Ahead
1990s -0.0936 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.3204 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2268 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Philippines
2000s -0.1485 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.1292 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0193 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Samoa
2010s 0.239 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4232 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1841 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Samoa
2020s 0.0923 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3654 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.273 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Samoa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher government effectiveness - governance estimate, Philippines or Samoa?
Samoa, at 0.2026 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.1947 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Philippines as of 2025.
What is the difference in government effectiveness - governance estimate between Philippines and Samoa?
0.0079 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Samoa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and Samoa?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do Philippines and Samoa rank globally for government effectiveness - governance estimate?
Philippines ranks 90th and Samoa ranks 88th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Philippines vs Samoa: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/government-effectiveness-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/philippines/samoa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/government-effectiveness-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/philippines/samoa/">Philippines vs Samoa: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,392 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.