Papua New Guinea vs Zimbabwe: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate

Papua New Guinea
-0.9004 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Zimbabwe
-0.9876 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Papua New Guinea rank
173rd
Zimbabwe rank
176th

Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate over time

  • Papua New Guinea
  • Zimbabwe
-1.5-1-0.50199620102024

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports -0.9004 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.9876 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.0872 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Papua New Guinea ranks 173rd and Zimbabwe ranks 176th of 204 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Papua New Guinea averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Papua New Guinea Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s -0.4075 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.1533 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2542 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Zimbabwe
2000s -0.6916 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.19 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.5017 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Papua New Guinea
2010s -0.7114 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.17 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4546 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Papua New Guinea
2020s -0.9727 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -1.06 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0875 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher government effectiveness - governance estimate, Papua New Guinea or Zimbabwe?
Papua New Guinea, at -0.9004 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.9876 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
What is the difference in government effectiveness - governance estimate between Papua New Guinea and Zimbabwe?
0.0872 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Zimbabwe?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Papua New Guinea and Zimbabwe rank globally for government effectiveness - governance estimate?
Papua New Guinea ranks 173rd and Zimbabwe ranks 176th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Papua New Guinea vs Zimbabwe: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/government-effectiveness-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/papua-new-guinea/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/government-effectiveness-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/papua-new-guinea/zimbabwe/">Papua New Guinea vs Zimbabwe: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,142 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.