North Macedonia vs Tonga: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate over time
- North Macedonia
- Tonga
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports -0.0323 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.0373 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Tonga, a difference of 0.005 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 21 shared years of data; in 2004 it was North Macedonia ahead.
North Macedonia ranks 103rd and Tonga ranks 104th of 204 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, North Macedonia averaged higher in 2 and Tonga in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Macedonia | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -0.3052 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.5258 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2206 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | North Macedonia |
| 2010s | -0.1294 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1083 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0211 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Tonga |
| 2020s | -0.034 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0567 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0227 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher government effectiveness - governance estimate, North Macedonia or Tonga?
- North Macedonia, at -0.0323 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.0373 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Tonga as of 2024.
- What is the difference in government effectiveness - governance estimate between North Macedonia and Tonga?
- 0.005 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Tonga?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2024.
- How do North Macedonia and Tonga rank globally for government effectiveness - governance estimate?
- North Macedonia ranks 103rd and Tonga ranks 104th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.