North Macedonia vs Palau: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate over time
- North Macedonia
- Palau
How they compare
Palau currently reports 0.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.0323 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in North Macedonia, a difference of 0.0423 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 17 shared years of data; in 2008 it was North Macedonia ahead.
North Macedonia ranks 103rd and Palau ranks 101st of 204 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, North Macedonia averaged higher in 2 and Palau in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Macedonia | Palau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -0.2578 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4384 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1806 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | North Macedonia |
| 2010s | -0.1294 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.2519 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1225 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | North Macedonia |
| 2020s | -0.034 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.0221 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0119 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Palau |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher government effectiveness - governance estimate, North Macedonia or Palau?
- Palau, at 0.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.0323 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in North Macedonia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in government effectiveness - governance estimate between North Macedonia and Palau?
- 0.0423 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Palau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Palau?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2024.
- How do North Macedonia and Palau rank globally for government effectiveness - governance estimate?
- North Macedonia ranks 103rd and Palau ranks 101st of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.