Nepal vs East Timor: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate over time
- Nepal
- East Timor
How they compare
Nepal currently reports -0.8845 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.8986 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in East Timor, a difference of 0.0141 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2002 it was East Timor ahead.
Nepal ranks 169th and East Timor ranks 172nd of 204 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Nepal averaged higher in 1 and East Timor in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nepal | East Timor | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -0.9408 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.9364 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0043 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | East Timor |
| 2010s | -0.9645 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -1.08 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1189 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Nepal |
| 2020s | -0.9311 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.793 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.1381 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | East Timor |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher government effectiveness - governance estimate, Nepal or East Timor?
- Nepal, at -0.8845 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.8986 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in East Timor as of 2024.
- What is the difference in government effectiveness - governance estimate between Nepal and East Timor?
- 0.0141 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and East Timor?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2024.
- How do Nepal and East Timor rank globally for government effectiveness - governance estimate?
- Nepal ranks 169th and East Timor ranks 172nd of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.