Naoero vs North Macedonia: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate over time
- Naoero
- North Macedonia
How they compare
Naoero currently reports 0.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.0323 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in North Macedonia, a difference of 0.0423 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2007 it was North Macedonia ahead.
Naoero ranks 101st and North Macedonia ranks 103rd of 204 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Naoero averaged higher in 2 and North Macedonia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Naoero | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -0.37 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.2859 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.084 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | North Macedonia |
| 2010s | -0.1175 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.1294 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0119 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Naoero |
| 2020s | -0.0328 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.034 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.0012 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Naoero |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher government effectiveness - governance estimate, Naoero or North Macedonia?
- Naoero, at 0.01 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.0323 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in North Macedonia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in government effectiveness - governance estimate between Naoero and North Macedonia?
- 0.0423 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Naoero ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Naoero and North Macedonia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2024.
- How do Naoero and North Macedonia rank globally for government effectiveness - governance estimate?
- Naoero ranks 101st and North Macedonia ranks 103rd of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.