Mauritania vs Sao Tome and Principe: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate

Mauritania
-0.7412 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Sao Tome and Principe
-0.7187 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Mauritania rank
159th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
157th

Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate over time

  • Mauritania
  • Sao Tome and Principe
-1-0.8-0.6-0.4-0.2199620102024

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports -0.7187 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.7412 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Mauritania, a difference of 0.0225 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Mauritania ahead.

Mauritania ranks 159th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 157th of 204 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Mauritania averaged higher in 2 and Sao Tome and Principe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritania Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1990s -0.278 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.7943 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.5163 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Mauritania
2000s -0.6027 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.8445 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2418 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Mauritania
2010s -0.7653 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.6567 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1087 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Sao Tome and Principe
2020s -0.8372 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.6254 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2118 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher government effectiveness - governance estimate, Mauritania or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at -0.7187 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.7412 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Mauritania as of 2024.
What is the difference in government effectiveness - governance estimate between Mauritania and Sao Tome and Principe?
0.0225 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Sao Tome and Principe?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Mauritania and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for government effectiveness - governance estimate?
Mauritania ranks 159th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 157th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritania vs Sao Tome and Principe: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/government-effectiveness-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/mauritania/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/government-effectiveness-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/mauritania/sao-tome-and-principe/">Mauritania vs Sao Tome and Principe: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,142 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.