Mauritania vs Nepal: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

Mauritania
-0.7567 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Nepal
-0.7696 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Mauritania rank
161st
Nepal rank
163rd

Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • Mauritania
  • Nepal
-1.2-1-0.8-0.6-0.4199620102025

How they compare

Mauritania currently reports -0.7567 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.7696 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Nepal, a difference of 0.0129 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Mauritania ahead.

Mauritania ranks 161st and Nepal ranks 163rd of 206 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Mauritania averaged higher in 3 and Nepal in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritania Nepal Difference Ahead
1990s -0.3204 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.8395 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.5192 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Mauritania
2000s -0.5625 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.9106 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3481 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Mauritania
2010s -0.6881 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.7848 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0967 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Mauritania
2020s -0.848 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.7871 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0609 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Nepal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher government effectiveness - governance estimate, Mauritania or Nepal?
Mauritania, at -0.7567 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.7696 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Nepal as of 2025.
What is the difference in government effectiveness - governance estimate between Mauritania and Nepal?
0.0129 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Mauritania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritania and Nepal?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do Mauritania and Nepal rank globally for government effectiveness - governance estimate?
Mauritania ranks 161st and Nepal ranks 163rd of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritania vs Nepal: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/government-effectiveness-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/mauritania/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/government-effectiveness-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/mauritania/nepal/">Mauritania vs Nepal: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,392 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.