Marshall Islands vs Tanzania: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate over time
- Marshall Islands
- Tanzania
How they compare
Marshall Islands currently reports -0.2909 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.2925 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Tanzania, a difference of 0.0016 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Tanzania ahead.
Marshall Islands ranks 127th and Tanzania ranks 128th of 204 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Marshall Islands averaged higher in 1 and Tanzania in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Marshall Islands | Tanzania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -0.8766 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4696 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.407 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Tanzania |
| 2010s | -0.7246 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.4673 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.2573 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Tanzania |
| 2020s | -0.21 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | -0.42 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.21 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | Marshall Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher government effectiveness - governance estimate, Marshall Islands or Tanzania?
- Marshall Islands, at -0.2909 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.2925 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Tanzania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in government effectiveness - governance estimate between Marshall Islands and Tanzania?
- 0.0016 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Marshall Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Marshall Islands and Tanzania?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Marshall Islands and Tanzania rank globally for government effectiveness - governance estimate?
- Marshall Islands ranks 127th and Tanzania ranks 128th of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.