Malaysia vs San Marino: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate over time
- Malaysia
- San Marino
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 0.9148 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.8976 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in San Marino, a difference of 0.0172 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2015 it was San Marino ahead.
Malaysia ranks 40th and San Marino ranks 41st of 204 countries.
San Marino has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | San Marino | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.8103 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.46 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.6453 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | San Marino |
| 2020s | 0.8238 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 1.17 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | 0.3492 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 | San Marino |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher government effectiveness - governance estimate, Malaysia or San Marino?
- Malaysia, at 0.9148 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.8976 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in San Marino as of 2024.
- What is the difference in government effectiveness - governance estimate between Malaysia and San Marino?
- 0.0172 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and San Marino?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
- How do Malaysia and San Marino rank globally for government effectiveness - governance estimate?
- Malaysia ranks 40th and San Marino ranks 41st of 204 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.