Malaysia vs Portugal: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate

Malaysia
0.9148 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Portugal
0.9475 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Malaysia rank
40th
Portugal rank
39th

Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate over time

  • Malaysia
  • Portugal
00.250.50.7511.2199620102024

How they compare

Portugal currently reports 0.9475 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.9148 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Malaysia, a difference of 0.0327 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Malaysia ahead.

Malaysia ranks 40th and Portugal ranks 39th of 204 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Malaysia averaged higher in 1 and Portugal in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malaysia Portugal Difference Ahead
1990s 0.752 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.7108 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0412 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Malaysia
2000s 0.8395 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.8647 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0252 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Portugal
2010s 0.858 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.9862 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1282 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Portugal
2020s 0.8238 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.04 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2165 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Portugal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher government effectiveness - governance estimate, Malaysia or Portugal?
Portugal, at 0.9475 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 0.9148 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Malaysia as of 2024.
What is the difference in government effectiveness - governance estimate between Malaysia and Portugal?
0.0327 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Portugal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Portugal?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Malaysia and Portugal rank globally for government effectiveness - governance estimate?
Malaysia ranks 40th and Portugal ranks 39th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malaysia vs Portugal: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/government-effectiveness-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/malaysia/portugal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/government-effectiveness-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/malaysia/portugal/">Malaysia vs Portugal: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,142 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.