Malawi vs Sao Tome and Principe: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate

Malawi
-0.7258 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Sao Tome and Principe
-0.7187 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Malawi rank
158th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
157th

Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate over time

  • Malawi
  • Sao Tome and Principe
-1.2-1-0.8-0.6-0.4199620102024

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports -0.7187 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.7258 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Malawi, a difference of 0.0071 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Malawi ranks 158th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 157th of 204 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Malawi averaged higher in 3 and Sao Tome and Principe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1990s -0.7405 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.7943 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0537 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Malawi
2000s -0.837 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.8445 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0075 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Malawi
2010s -0.5908 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.6567 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0658 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Malawi
2020s -0.7408 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.6254 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1154 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher government effectiveness - governance estimate, Malawi or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at -0.7187 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.7258 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Malawi as of 2024.
What is the difference in government effectiveness - governance estimate between Malawi and Sao Tome and Principe?
0.0071 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Sao Tome and Principe?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Malawi and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for government effectiveness - governance estimate?
Malawi ranks 158th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 157th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malawi vs Sao Tome and Principe: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/government-effectiveness-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/malawi/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/government-effectiveness-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/malawi/sao-tome-and-principe/">Malawi vs Sao Tome and Principe: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,142 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.