Malawi vs Pakistan: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

Malawi
-0.6029 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Pakistan
-0.606 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Malawi rank
151st
Pakistan rank
153rd

Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • Malawi
  • Pakistan
-1.2-1-0.8-0.6-0.4199620102025

How they compare

Malawi currently reports -0.6029 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.606 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Pakistan, a difference of 0.0031 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Pakistan ahead.

Malawi ranks 151st and Pakistan ranks 153rd of 206 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Malawi averaged higher in 1 and Pakistan in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi Pakistan Difference Ahead
1990s -0.9318 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.6371 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2947 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Pakistan
2000s -0.8586 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.6441 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.2145 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Pakistan
2010s -0.4579 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.5032 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0453 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Malawi
2020s -0.638 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 -0.5492 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0888 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher government effectiveness - governance estimate, Malawi or Pakistan?
Malawi, at -0.6029 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against -0.606 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Pakistan as of 2025.
What is the difference in government effectiveness - governance estimate between Malawi and Pakistan?
0.0031 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Pakistan?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do Malawi and Pakistan rank globally for government effectiveness - governance estimate?
Malawi ranks 151st and Pakistan ranks 153rd of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malawi vs Pakistan: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/government-effectiveness-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/malawi/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/government-effectiveness-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/malawi/pakistan/">Malawi vs Pakistan: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,392 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.