Macao vs United States: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

Macao
1.16 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
United States
1.19 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Macao rank
33rd
United States rank
32nd

Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • Macao
  • United States
00.511.52199620102025

How they compare

United States currently reports 1.19 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.16 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Macao, a difference of 0.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

Across all 27 years both countries report, United States has been ahead every year.

Macao ranks 33rd and United States ranks 32nd of 206 countries.

United States has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Macao United States Difference Ahead
1990s 0.1988 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.76 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.56 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 United States
2000s 0.8763 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.63 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.751 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 United States
2010s 0.9746 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.52 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.5479 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 United States
2020s 1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.31 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3075 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 United States

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher government effectiveness - governance estimate, Macao or United States?
United States, at 1.19 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.16 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Macao as of 2025.
What is the difference in government effectiveness - governance estimate between Macao and United States?
0.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with United States ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Macao and United States?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do Macao and United States rank globally for government effectiveness - governance estimate?
Macao ranks 33rd and United States ranks 32nd of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Macao vs United States: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/government-effectiveness-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/macao-sar-china/united-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/government-effectiveness-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/macao-sar-china/united-states/">Macao vs United States: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,392 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.