Macao vs Slovenia: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)

Macao
1.16 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Slovenia
1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2025
Macao rank
33rd
Slovenia rank
36th

Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5) over time

  • Macao
  • Slovenia
0.250.50.7511.2199620102025

How they compare

Macao currently reports 1.16 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Slovenia, a difference of 0.06 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

That makes Macao's figure about 1.1 times Slovenia's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Slovenia ahead.

Macao ranks 33rd and Slovenia ranks 36th of 206 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Macao averaged higher in 1 and Slovenia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Macao Slovenia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.1988 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.614 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.4152 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Slovenia
2000s 0.8763 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.7673 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1089 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Macao
2010s 0.9746 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0599 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Slovenia
2020s 1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.16 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1586 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Slovenia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher government effectiveness - governance estimate, Macao or Slovenia?
Macao, at 1.16 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.1 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Slovenia as of 2025.
What is the difference in government effectiveness - governance estimate between Macao and Slovenia?
0.06 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Macao ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Macao and Slovenia?
27 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do Macao and Slovenia rank globally for government effectiveness - governance estimate?
Macao ranks 33rd and Slovenia ranks 36th of 206 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Macao vs Slovenia: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 13 November 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/government-effectiveness-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/macao-sar-china/slovenia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/government-effectiveness-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/macao-sar-china/slovenia/">Macao vs Slovenia: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
206 places, 5,392 data points, 1996–2025
Last refreshed

Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.