Macau (China) vs Slovenia: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate

Macau (China)
1.12 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Slovenia
1.09 approx. -2.5 to +2.5
in 2024
Macau (China) rank
35th
Slovenia rank
37th

Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate over time

  • Macau (China)
  • Slovenia
0.250.50.7511.2199620102024

How they compare

Macau (China) currently reports 1.12 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.09 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Slovenia, a difference of 0.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Slovenia ahead.

Macau (China) ranks 35th and Slovenia ranks 37th of 204 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Macau (China) averaged higher in 2 and Slovenia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Macau (China) Slovenia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.2383 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.6377 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.3994 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Slovenia
2000s 0.8998 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.7786 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.1212 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Macau (China)
2010s 1.09 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.04 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.0493 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Macau (China)
2020s 1.12 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 1.24 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 0.129 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 Slovenia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher government effectiveness - governance estimate, Macau (China) or Slovenia?
Macau (China), at 1.12 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 against 1.09 approx. -2.5 to +2.5 in Slovenia as of 2024.
What is the difference in government effectiveness - governance estimate between Macau (China) and Slovenia?
0.03 approx. -2.5 to +2.5, with Macau (China) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Macau (China) and Slovenia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2024.
How do Macau (China) and Slovenia rank globally for government effectiveness - governance estimate?
Macau (China) ranks 35th and Slovenia ranks 37th of 204 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG), published as Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Macau (China) vs Slovenia: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate. Statizoid, drawing on The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG). Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/government-effectiveness-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/macao-sar-china/slovenia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/government-effectiveness-governance-estimate-approx-2-5-to-2-5/macao-sar-china/slovenia/">Macau (China) vs Slovenia: Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Government Effectiveness - Governance estimate (approx. -2.5 to +2.5)
Unit
approx. -2.5 to +2.5
Source
The Worldwide Governance Indicators: Revised Methodology for Measuring Governance Using Perception Data., World Bank Group (WBG)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
204 places, 5,142 data points, 1996–2024
Last refreshed

Government Effectiveness (GE) captures perceptions of the quality of public services, the civil service, policy formulation and implementation, and the credibility of a government’s decisions. Governance estimate from the aggregation model, in units of a standard normal distribution, i.e. ranging from approximately -2.5 to 2.5. Larger values correspond to better governance. The (country-series-time) metadata include the (a) number of sources, and (b) standard error. The number of sources indicates the number of underlying data sources on which the governance estimate is based. The standard error indicates the precision of the governance estimate. Larger values indicate less precise estimates. A 90% confidence interval for the governance estimate is given by the estimate +/- 1.64 times the standard error.